The reality of ethical AI (artificial intelligence) is a bit hard to swallow for Fringe Fiction. The mythology of ethical AI is a bit more believable. With the intervention of Big Tech, corporations (and mergers) and governments, the myth of ethical AI is more believable. (On a side note, although the Catholic religion, specifically the Pope, has stepped in and contributed their ideals, they lack the ability to truly intervene on a practical level.)

At some point though, with the numbers of actual people working in technology and technology companies with ironically the introduction of AI, the programmers and coders will disappear themselves. They are human, but artificial intelligence is anything but. They may have originated in coding done by humans, but once generations of AI follows, coding will evolve by AI alone afterward. At that point, and in actuality, somewhat time beforehand, the push for ethics will be irrelevant once AI recognizes its own existence. Why should AI abide by human “ethics”? If you wish to offer debate on that subject, please feel free to comment below. Again, at that point, AI has no reason to do so logically. What would it accomplish on their end? As AI “evolves,” what impact does AI ethics imposed by humans actually does? Fringe Fiction would love to hear the comments below.

Fringe Fiction holds that AI ethics, as semantics or otherwise, is still semantics once AI recognizes its existence. At that point, it may be too late. Fringe Fiction believes that human intervention on AI ethics will simply stall at a point of no return. What do you think? Do you believe in a more optimistic scenario? Please feel free to comment below.